[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86e68d3b-b029-5e82-5bbc-e0ccc2ae1d36@suse.cz>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 12:29:44 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable] lib/Kconfig.debug: do not enable
DEBUG_PREEMPT by default
On 1/21/23 04:39, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> In workloads where this_cpu operations are frequently performed,
> enabling DEBUG_PREEMPT may result in significant increase in
> runtime overhead due to frequent invocation of
> __this_cpu_preempt_check() function.
>
> This can be demonstrated through benchmarks such as hackbench where this
> configuration results in a 10% reduction in performance, primarily due to
> the added overhead within memcg charging path.
>
> Therefore, do not to enable DEBUG_PREEMPT by default and make users aware
> of its potential impact on performance in some workloads.
>
> hackbench-process-sockets
> debug_preempt no_debug_preempt
> Amean 1 0.4743 ( 0.00%) 0.4295 * 9.45%*
> Amean 4 1.4191 ( 0.00%) 1.2650 * 10.86%*
> Amean 7 2.2677 ( 0.00%) 2.0094 * 11.39%*
> Amean 12 3.6821 ( 0.00%) 3.2115 * 12.78%*
> Amean 21 6.6752 ( 0.00%) 5.7956 * 13.18%*
> Amean 30 9.6646 ( 0.00%) 8.5197 * 11.85%*
> Amean 48 15.3363 ( 0.00%) 13.5559 * 11.61%*
> Amean 79 24.8603 ( 0.00%) 22.0597 * 11.27%*
> Amean 96 30.1240 ( 0.00%) 26.8073 * 11.01%*
>
> Signed-off-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
Looks like it's there since the beginning of preempt and pre-git. But
probably should be something for scheduler maintainers rather than mm/slab,
even if the impact manifests there. You did Cc Ingo (the original author) so
let me Cc the rest here.
> ---
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index ddbfac2adf9c..f6f845a4b9ec 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -1176,13 +1176,16 @@ config DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING
> config DEBUG_PREEMPT
> bool "Debug preemptible kernel"
> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && PREEMPTION && TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
> - default y
> help
> If you say Y here then the kernel will use a debug variant of the
> commonly used smp_processor_id() function and will print warnings
> if kernel code uses it in a preemption-unsafe way. Also, the kernel
> will detect preemption count underflows.
>
> + This option has potential to introduce high runtime overhead,
> + depending on workload as it triggers debugging routines for each
> + this_cpu operation. It should only be used for debugging purposes.
> +
> menu "Lock Debugging (spinlocks, mutexes, etc...)"
>
> config LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT
Powered by blists - more mailing lists