[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <167431286787.4906.11043739743543659187.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 14:54:27 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Pass the microcode revision
to print_ucode_info() directly
The following commit has been merged into the x86/microcode branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 174f1b909ab0984e5369a634971fb14a618ca797
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/174f1b909ab0984e5369a634971fb14a618ca797
Author: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 07:35:53 -08:00
Committer: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
CommitterDate: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 14:55:20 +01:00
x86/microcode/intel: Pass the microcode revision to print_ucode_info() directly
print_ucode_info() takes a struct ucode_cpu_info pointer as parameter.
Its sole purpose is to print the microcode revision.
The only available ucode_cpu_info always describes the currently loaded
microcode revision. After a microcode update is successful, this is the
new revision, or on failure it is the original revision.
In preparation for future changes, replace the struct ucode_cpu_info
pointer parameter with a plain integer which contains the revision
number and adjust the call sites accordingly.
No functional change.
[ bp:
- Fix + cleanup commit message.
- Revert arbitrary, unrelated change.
]
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230120161923.118882-5-ashok.raj@intel.com
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 30 +++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index cac2bdb..9dbd007 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -308,11 +308,10 @@ static bool load_builtin_intel_microcode(struct cpio_data *cp)
/*
* Print ucode update info.
*/
-static void
-print_ucode_info(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, unsigned int date)
+static void print_ucode_info(unsigned int new_rev, unsigned int date)
{
pr_info_once("microcode updated early to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
- uci->cpu_sig.rev,
+ new_rev,
date & 0xffff,
date >> 24,
(date >> 16) & 0xff);
@@ -332,7 +331,7 @@ void show_ucode_info_early(void)
if (delay_ucode_info) {
intel_cpu_collect_info(&uci);
- print_ucode_info(&uci, current_mc_date);
+ print_ucode_info(uci.cpu_sig.rev, current_mc_date);
delay_ucode_info = 0;
}
}
@@ -341,33 +340,22 @@ void show_ucode_info_early(void)
* At this point, we can not call printk() yet. Delay printing microcode info in
* show_ucode_info_early() until printk() works.
*/
-static void print_ucode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
+static void print_ucode(int new_rev, int date)
{
- struct microcode_intel *mc;
int *delay_ucode_info_p;
int *current_mc_date_p;
- mc = uci->mc;
- if (!mc)
- return;
-
delay_ucode_info_p = (int *)__pa_nodebug(&delay_ucode_info);
current_mc_date_p = (int *)__pa_nodebug(¤t_mc_date);
*delay_ucode_info_p = 1;
- *current_mc_date_p = mc->hdr.date;
+ *current_mc_date_p = date;
}
#else
-static inline void print_ucode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
+static inline void print_ucode(int new_rev, int date)
{
- struct microcode_intel *mc;
-
- mc = uci->mc;
- if (!mc)
- return;
-
- print_ucode_info(uci, mc->hdr.date);
+ print_ucode_info(new_rev, date);
}
#endif
@@ -407,9 +395,9 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
if (early)
- print_ucode(uci);
+ print_ucode(uci->cpu_sig.rev, mc->hdr.date);
else
- print_ucode_info(uci, mc->hdr.date);
+ print_ucode_info(uci->cpu_sig.rev, mc->hdr.date);
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists