[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3632669.kckeHSHuci@prancing-pony>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 21:53:51 +0100
From: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
To: Edward <edward.baker@...el.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
"open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf: Various spelling fixes
On Saturday, 21 January 2023 20:25:46 CET Ian Rogers wrote:
> The JSON files are generated from Intel information here:
> https://github.com/intel/perfmon/
> Fixing the spelling in the tree means that when we update the
> incorrect spelling will be generated again. Intel are looking at the
> matter, I've added Edward Baker to the e-mail. To make it clearer,
> could you separate the JSON fixes from the tool fixes?
Yes, I'll send a v2 patch with the JSON files excluded.
And I'll send a PR to the GH repo.
> Could you also add the mistakes found by this list to:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scri
> pts/spelling.txt which will mean the checkpatch.pl tool will flag the
> mistakes should regressions happen.
Ha! That's based on Debian's lintian tool (too) :-D
I'll make/send a separate patch to include the ones lintian found.
Lintian found several more, but I filtered the list I send to belong to `tools/
perf` hoping/assuming the To list wouldn't be so long (which didn't work out
as well as I hoped ;-)).
> Beside those 2 suggestions, the corrections look great and thank you
> for taking the time to do this.
Cool :-)
Cheers,
Diederik
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists