linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: Replace printk+WARN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y82LpRtFFux4wUaD@ubun2204.myguest.virtualbox.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 00:46:53 +0530
From:   Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
To:     "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...rosoft.com>,
        Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: Replace printk+WARN_ON by WARN macro

On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 01:43:15AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> A combination of printk() followed by WARN_ON() macro can be simplified
> using a single WARN(1, ...) macro. Patch change suggested by warn.cocci
> Coccinelle semantic patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>    - Remove printk() from the WARN macro to avoid build warning
>    - I missed to build the change before sending the earlier version which
>      results in a build error due to incorrect brace balancing. Fixed it.

Hello,
May I request a review and feedback comments on this patch proposal?

Thank you,
./drv

> 
>  drivers/scsi/initio.c   | 3 +--
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 6 ++----
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/initio.c b/drivers/scsi/initio.c
> index 375261d67619..fea591d9d292 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/initio.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/initio.c
> @@ -2738,8 +2738,7 @@ static void i91uSCBPost(u8 * host_mem, u8 * cblk_mem)
>  	host = (struct initio_host *) host_mem;
>  	cblk = (struct scsi_ctrl_blk *) cblk_mem;
>  	if ((cmnd = cblk->srb) == NULL) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "i91uSCBPost: SRB pointer is empty\n");
> -		WARN_ON(1);
> +		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "i91uSCBPost: SRB pointer is empty\n");
>  		initio_release_scb(host, cblk);	/* Release SCB for current channel */
>  		return;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index 9ed1ebcb7443..0f1e9ee4591b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -3009,10 +3009,8 @@ void *scsi_kmap_atomic_sg(struct scatterlist *sgl, int sg_count,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (unlikely(i == sg_count)) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Bytes in sg: %zu, requested offset %zu, "
> -			"elements %d\n",
> -		       __func__, sg_len, *offset, sg_count);
> -		WARN_ON(1);
> +		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "%s: Bytes in sg: %zu, requested offset %zu, elements %d\n",
> +				__func__, sg_len, *offset, sg_count);
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 
>