[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAYXXYy7=ZTCZ1LQ3_Sy39ju_xG5++dTrxi+DKGcbpJ5VJ3OuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:30:30 -0800
From: Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
isaku.yamahata@...el.com, sagis@...gle.com, afranji@...gle.com,
runanwang@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org, drjones@...hat.com,
maz@...nel.org, bgardon@...gle.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
dmatlack@...gle.com, peterx@...hat.com, oupton@...gle.com,
ricarkol@...gle.com, yang.zhong@...el.com, wei.w.wang@...el.com,
xiaoyao.li@...el.com, pgonda@...gle.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
eesposit@...hat.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, eric.auger@...hat.com,
wangyanan55@...wei.com, aaronlewis@...gle.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
pshier@...gle.com, axelrasmussen@...gle.com,
zhenzhong.duan@...el.com, maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com,
like.xu@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 08/31] KVM: selftests: Require GCC to realign
stacks on function entry
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 4:28 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023, Ackerley Tng wrote:
> > Some SSE instructions assume a 16-byte aligned stack, and GCC compiles
> > assuming the stack is aligned:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838. This combination
> > results in a #GP in guests.
> >
> > Adding this compiler flag will generate an alternate prologue and
> > epilogue to realign the runtime stack, which makes selftest code
> > slower and bigger, but this is okay since we do not need selftest code
> > to be extremely performant.
>
> Huh, I had completely forgotten that this is why SSE is problematic. I ran into
> this with the base UPM selftests and just disabled SSE. /facepalm.
>
> We should figure out exactly what is causing a misaligned stack. As you've noted,
> the x86-64 ABI requires a 16-byte aligned RSP. Unless I'm misreading vm_arch_vcpu_add(),
> the starting stack should be page aligned, which means something is causing the
> stack to become unaligned at runtime. I'd rather hunt down that something than
> paper over it by having the compiler force realignment.
Is not it due to the 32bit execution part of the guest code at boot
time. Any push/pop of 32bit registers might make it a 16-byte
unaligned stack.
>
> > Similar issue discussed at
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAGtprH9yKvuaF5yruh3BupQe4BxDGiBQk3ExtY2m39yP-tppsg@mail.gmail.com/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> > index 317927d9c55bd..5f9cc1e6ee67e 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> > @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ LINUX_TOOL_ARCH_INCLUDE = $(top_srcdir)/tools/arch/x86/include
> > else
> > LINUX_TOOL_ARCH_INCLUDE = $(top_srcdir)/tools/arch/$(ARCH)/include
> > endif
> > -CFLAGS += -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wuninitialized -O2 -g -std=gnu99 \
> > +CFLAGS += -mstackrealign -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wuninitialized -O2 -g -std=gnu99 \
> > -fno-stack-protector -fno-PIE -I$(LINUX_TOOL_INCLUDE) \
> > -I$(LINUX_TOOL_ARCH_INCLUDE) -I$(LINUX_HDR_PATH) -Iinclude \
> > -I$(<D) -Iinclude/$(UNAME_M) -I ../rseq -I.. $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) \
> > --
> > 2.39.0.246.g2a6d74b583-goog
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists