linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] thermal: intel: Use generic trip points in 2 drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19f1860e20fbc75c3d2c3eefda29cccd18ca59a9.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:26:09 -0800
From:   srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] thermal: intel: Use generic trip points in 2
 drivers

On Mon, 2023-01-23 at 19:52 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, January 23, 2023 7:45:30 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, January 23, 2023 7:36:52 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> > > This is a new version of the series from Daniel posted as:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20230120231530.2368330-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org/
> > > 
> > > The first patch has been reworked (see
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/5911499.lOV4Wx5bFT@kreacher/)
> > > and the other two have been rebased on top of it.
> > > 
> > > I have retained the R-by tags from Rui, because the changes in
> > > patches [2-3/3] are
> > > not essential, but I think that this new set needs to be tested
> > > again.
> > > 
> > > Srinivas, can you test it please?
> > 
> > Something's wrong, sorry.
> > 
> > I get some invalid trip temperatures with this set.
> 
> Sorry, scratch this, I got confused by THERMAL_TEMP_INVALID showing
> up in
> sysfs, but it did show up before too.
> 
> Please test!
> 

> 

> 
> It will be easy if you have some test branch to avoid dependecies on
> other patches.

Thanks,
Srinivas

> 
>