linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] thermal/drivers/intel: Use generic trip points for intel_soc_dts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gSG3aaeywiMWZTzWHmz_tVupeB1xyZfXhhXJ3NEV8-Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 21:19:02 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...nel.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] thermal/drivers/intel: Use generic trip points for intel_soc_dts_iosf

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 7:09 PM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Srinivas,
>
> On 19/01/2023 21:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 7:16 PM Daniel Lezcano
> > <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...nel.org>
> >>
> >> The thermal framework gives the possibility to register the trip
> >> points with the thermal zone. When that is done, no get_trip_* ops are
> >> needed and they can be removed.
> >>
> >> Convert ops content logic into generic trip points and register them with the
> >> thermal zone.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> >> ---
>
> [ ... ]
>
> >>
> >> @@ -320,7 +304,8 @@ static int add_dts_thermal_zone(int id, struct intel_soc_dts_sensor_entry *dts,
> >>          dts->trip_mask = trip_mask;
> >>          dts->trip_count = trip_count;
> >>          snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "soc_dts%d", id);
> >> -       dts->tzone = thermal_zone_device_register(name,
> >> +       dts->tzone = thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips(name,
> >> +                                                 dts->trips,
> >>                                                    trip_count,
> >>                                                    trip_mask,
> >>                                                    dts, &tzone_ops,
> >> @@ -430,27 +415,28 @@ struct intel_soc_dts_sensors *intel_soc_dts_iosf_init(
> >>                  notification = false;
> >>          else
> >>                  notification = true;
> >> -       for (i = 0; i < SOC_MAX_DTS_SENSORS; ++i) {
> >> -               sensors->soc_dts[i].sensors = sensors;
> >> -               ret = add_dts_thermal_zone(i, &sensors->soc_dts[i],
> >> -                                          notification, trip_count,
> >> -                                          read_only_trip_count);
> >> -               if (ret)
> >> -                       goto err_free;
> >> -       }
> >
> > How is this change related to the rest of the patch?
>
> We want to register the thermal zone with the trip points.
>
> thermal_zone_device_register() becomes
>
> thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips()
>
> But in the current code, the trip points are updated after the thermal
> zones are created (and strictly speaking it is wrong as get_trip_temp
> can be invoked before the trip points are updated).
>
> So the change inverts the initialization where we update the trip points
> and then we register the thermal zones.

It would be nice to write this in the changelog too.

> >>
> >>          for (i = 0; i < SOC_MAX_DTS_SENSORS; ++i) {
> >>                  ret = update_trip_temp(&sensors->soc_dts[i], 0, 0,
> >>                                         THERMAL_TRIP_PASSIVE);
> >>                  if (ret)
> >> -                       goto err_remove_zone;
> >> +                       goto err_free;
> >>
> >>                  ret = update_trip_temp(&sensors->soc_dts[i], 1, 0,
> >>                                         THERMAL_TRIP_PASSIVE);
> >>                  if (ret)
> >> -                       goto err_remove_zone;
> >> +                       goto err_free;
> >>          }
> >>
> >> +       for (i = 0; i < SOC_MAX_DTS_SENSORS; ++i) {
> >> +               sensors->soc_dts[i].sensors = sensors;
> >> +               ret = add_dts_thermal_zone(i, &sensors->soc_dts[i],
> >> +                                          notification, trip_count,
> >> +                                          read_only_trip_count);
> >> +               if (ret)
> >> +                       goto err_remove_zone;
> >> +       }
> >> +
>
> --