Message-ID: <CAHVum0fcn1c17TzyTOyJPML=ApNHWFr1PA0fUAOEUnP1_GO06g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 13:32:12 -0800
From:   Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
To:     Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests: KVM: Add page splitting test

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:03 AM Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Add a test for page splitting during dirty logging and for hugepage
> recovery after dirty logging.
>
> Page splitting represents non-trivial behavior, which is complicated
> by MANUAL_PROTECT mode, which causes pages to be split on the first
> clear, instead of when dirty logging is enabled.
>
> Add a test which makes asserions about page counts to help define the

nit: assertions

> expected behavior of page splitting and to provid needed coverage of the

nit: provide

> behavior. This also helps ensure that a failure in eager page splitting
> is not covered up by splitting in the vCPU path.
>
> Tested by running the test on an Intel Haswell machine w/wo
> MANUAL_PROTECT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile          |   1 +
>  .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h     |   1 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c    |   5 +
>  .../kvm/x86_64/page_splitting_test.c          | 278 ++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 285 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/page_splitting_test.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> index 1750f91dd9362..057ebd709e77a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/kvm_pv_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/mmio_warning_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/monitor_mwait_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/nested_exceptions_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/page_splitting_test

Should the test be named dirty_log_page_splitting_test or
dirty_log_page_split_and_recovery_test?

page_splitting_test name is very generic and does not convey much information.

>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/platform_info_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/set_boot_cpu_id
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h
> index fbc2a79369b8b..a089c356f354e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h
> @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ extern const struct vm_guest_mode_params vm_guest_mode_params[];
>  int open_path_or_exit(const char *path, int flags);
>  int open_kvm_dev_path_or_exit(void);
>
> +bool get_kvm_param_bool(const char *param);
>  bool get_kvm_intel_param_bool(const char *param);
>  bool get_kvm_amd_param_bool(const char *param);
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> index 56d5ea949cbbe..fa6d69f731990 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,11 @@ static bool get_module_param_bool(const char *module_name, const char *param)
>         TEST_FAIL("Unrecognized value '%c' for boolean module param", value);
>  }
>
> +bool get_kvm_param_bool(const char *param)
> +{
> +       return get_module_param_bool("kvm", param);
> +}
> +
>  bool get_kvm_intel_param_bool(const char *param)
>  {
>         return get_module_param_bool("kvm_intel", param);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/page_splitting_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/page_splitting_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..2b4a28e6a95de
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/page_splitting_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,278 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * KVM dirty logging page splitting test
> + *
> + * Based on dirty_log_perf.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2018, Red Hat, Inc.

Delete?

> + * Copyright (C) 2020, Google, Inc.

2023


> + */
> +
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <time.h>
> +#include <pthread.h>
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> +
> +#include "kvm_util.h"
> +#include "test_util.h"
> +#include "memstress.h"
> +#include "guest_modes.h"
> +
> +#define VCPUS          2
> +#define SLOTS          2
> +#define ITERATIONS     2
> +
> +static uint64_t guest_percpu_mem_size = DEFAULT_PER_VCPU_MEM_SIZE;
> +
> +static enum vm_mem_backing_src_type backing_src = VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS_HUGETLB;
> +
> +static u64 dirty_log_manual_caps;
> +static bool host_quit;
> +static int iteration;
> +static int vcpu_last_completed_iteration[KVM_MAX_VCPUS];
> +
> +struct kvm_page_stats {
> +       uint64_t pages_4k;
> +       uint64_t pages_2m;
> +       uint64_t pages_1g;
> +       uint64_t hugepages;
> +};
> +
> +static void get_page_stats(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_page_stats *stats, const char *stage)
> +{
> +       stats->pages_4k = vm_get_stat(vm, "pages_4k");
> +       stats->pages_2m = vm_get_stat(vm, "pages_2m");
> +       stats->pages_1g = vm_get_stat(vm, "pages_1g");
> +       stats->hugepages = stats->pages_2m + stats->pages_1g;
> +
> +       pr_debug("\nGetting stats after %s: 4K: %ld 2M: %ld 1G: %ld huge: %ld\n",
> +                stage, stats->pages_4k, stats->pages_2m, stats->pages_1g,
> +                stats->hugepages);
> +}
> +
> +static void run_vcpus_get_page_stats(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_page_stats *stats, const char *stage)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +
> +       iteration++;
> +       for (i = 0; i < VCPUS; i++) {
> +               while (READ_ONCE(vcpu_last_completed_iteration[i]) !=
> +                      iteration)
> +                       ;
> +       }
> +
> +       get_page_stats(vm, stats, stage);
> +}
> +
> +static void vcpu_worker(struct memstress_vcpu_args *vcpu_args)
> +{
> +       struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = vcpu_args->vcpu;
> +       int vcpu_idx = vcpu_args->vcpu_idx;
> +       struct kvm_run *run;
> +
> +       run = vcpu->run;
> +
> +       while (!READ_ONCE(host_quit)) {
> +               int current_iteration = READ_ONCE(iteration);
> +
> +               vcpu_run(vcpu);
> +
> +               TEST_ASSERT(get_ucall(vcpu, NULL) == UCALL_SYNC,
> +                           "Invalid guest sync status: exit_reason=%s\n",
> +                           exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason));
> +
> +               vcpu_last_completed_iteration[vcpu_idx] = current_iteration;
> +
> +               /* Wait for the start of the next iteration to be signaled. */
> +               while (current_iteration == READ_ONCE(iteration) &&
> +                      READ_ONCE(iteration) >= 0 &&
> +                      !READ_ONCE(host_quit))
> +                       ;
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *unused)
> +{
> +       struct kvm_vm *vm;
> +       unsigned long **bitmaps;
> +       uint64_t guest_num_pages;
> +       uint64_t host_num_pages;
> +       uint64_t pages_per_slot;
> +       int i;
> +       uint64_t total_4k_pages;
> +       struct kvm_page_stats stats_populated;
> +       struct kvm_page_stats stats_dirty_logging_enabled;
> +       struct kvm_page_stats stats_dirty_pass[ITERATIONS];
> +       struct kvm_page_stats stats_clear_pass[ITERATIONS];
> +       struct kvm_page_stats stats_dirty_logging_disabled;
> +       struct kvm_page_stats stats_repopulated;
> +
> +       vm = memstress_create_vm(mode, VCPUS, guest_percpu_mem_size,
> +                                SLOTS, backing_src, false);
> +
> +       guest_num_pages = (VCPUS * guest_percpu_mem_size) >> vm->page_shift;
> +       guest_num_pages = vm_adjust_num_guest_pages(mode, guest_num_pages);
> +       host_num_pages = vm_num_host_pages(mode, guest_num_pages);
> +       pages_per_slot = host_num_pages / SLOTS;
> +
> +       bitmaps = memstress_alloc_bitmaps(SLOTS, pages_per_slot);
> +
> +       if (dirty_log_manual_caps)
> +               vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2,
> +                             dirty_log_manual_caps);
> +
> +       /* Start the iterations */
> +       iteration = -1;
> +       host_quit = false;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < VCPUS; i++)
> +               vcpu_last_completed_iteration[i] = -1;
> +
> +       memstress_start_vcpu_threads(VCPUS, vcpu_worker);
> +
> +       run_vcpus_get_page_stats(vm, &stats_populated, "populating memory");
> +
> +       /* Enable dirty logging */
> +       memstress_enable_dirty_logging(vm, SLOTS);
> +
> +       get_page_stats(vm, &stats_dirty_logging_enabled, "enabling dirty logging");
> +
> +       while (iteration < ITERATIONS) {
> +               run_vcpus_get_page_stats(vm, &stats_dirty_pass[iteration - 1],
> +                                        "dirtying memory");
> +
> +               memstress_get_dirty_log(vm, bitmaps, SLOTS);
> +
> +               if (dirty_log_manual_caps) {
> +                       memstress_clear_dirty_log(vm, bitmaps, SLOTS, pages_per_slot);
> +
> +                       get_page_stats(vm, &stats_clear_pass[iteration - 1], "clearing dirty log");
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       /* Disable dirty logging */
> +       memstress_disable_dirty_logging(vm, SLOTS);
> +
> +       get_page_stats(vm, &stats_dirty_logging_disabled, "disabling dirty logging");
> +
> +       /* Run vCPUs again to fault pages back in. */
> +       run_vcpus_get_page_stats(vm, &stats_repopulated, "repopulating memory");
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Tell the vCPU threads to quit.  No need to manually check that vCPUs
> +        * have stopped running after disabling dirty logging, the join will
> +        * wait for them to exit.
> +        */
> +       host_quit = true;
> +       memstress_join_vcpu_threads(VCPUS);
> +
> +       memstress_free_bitmaps(bitmaps, SLOTS);
> +       memstress_destroy_vm(vm);
> +
> +       /* Make assertions about the page counts. */
> +       total_4k_pages = stats_populated.pages_4k;
> +       total_4k_pages += stats_populated.pages_2m * 512;
> +       total_4k_pages += stats_populated.pages_1g * 512 * 512;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Check that all huge pages were split. Since large pages can only
> +        * exist in the data slot, and the vCPUs should have dirtied all pages
> +        * in the data slot, there should be no huge pages left after splitting.
> +        * Splitting happens at dirty log enable time without
> +        * KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2 and after the first clear pass
> +        * with that capability.
> +        */
> +       if (dirty_log_manual_caps) {
> +               TEST_ASSERT(stats_clear_pass[0].hugepages == 0,
> +                           "Unexpected huge page count after splitting. Expected 0, got %ld",
> +                           stats_clear_pass[0].hugepages);
> +               TEST_ASSERT(stats_clear_pass[0].pages_4k == total_4k_pages,
> +                           "All memory should be mapped at 4k. Expected %ld 4k pages, got %ld",
> +                           total_4k_pages, stats_clear_pass[0].pages_4k);
> +               TEST_ASSERT(stats_dirty_logging_enabled.hugepages == stats_populated.hugepages,
> +                           "Huge page count should not have changed from enabling dirty logging. Expected %ld, got %ld",
> +                           stats_populated.hugepages, stats_dirty_logging_enabled.hugepages);
> +       } else {
> +               TEST_ASSERT(stats_dirty_logging_enabled.hugepages == 0,
> +                           "Unexpected huge page count after splitting. Expected 0, got %ld",
> +                           stats_dirty_logging_enabled.hugepages);
> +               TEST_ASSERT(stats_dirty_logging_enabled.pages_4k == total_4k_pages,
> +                           "All memory should be mapped at 4k. Expected %ld 4k pages, got %ld",
> +                           total_4k_pages, stats_dirty_logging_enabled.pages_4k);
> +       }
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Once dirty logging is disabled and the vCPUs have touched all their
> +        * memory again, the page counts should be the same as they were
> +        * right after initial population of memory.
> +        */
> +       TEST_ASSERT(stats_populated.pages_4k == stats_repopulated.pages_4k,
> +                   "4k page count did not return to its initial value after "
> +                   "dirty logging. Expected %ld, got %ld",
> +                   stats_populated.pages_4k, stats_repopulated.pages_4k);
> +       TEST_ASSERT(stats_populated.pages_2m == stats_repopulated.pages_2m,
> +                   "2m page count did not return to its initial value after "
> +                   "dirty logging. Expected %ld, got %ld",
> +                   stats_populated.pages_2m, stats_repopulated.pages_2m);
> +       TEST_ASSERT(stats_populated.pages_1g == stats_repopulated.pages_1g,
> +                   "1g page count did not return to its initial value after "
> +                   "dirty logging. Expected %ld, got %ld",
> +                   stats_populated.pages_1g, stats_repopulated.pages_1g);
> +}

I know David suggested in the previous version to use __ASSERT_EQ().

I will recommend using __ASSERT_EQ(). If you make the variables name
meaningful then that should be sufficient in showing the expected
intent. Some examples:
ASSERT_EQ(after_clear_dirty_log.hugepages, 0);
ASSERT_EQ(after_clear_dirty_log.pages_4k, total_4k_pages);
ASSERT_EQ(after_enable_dirty_log.hugepages, initial_state.hugepages);
ASSERT_EQ(initial_state.pages_4k, after_disable_dirty_logging.pages_4k);
...

This makes code cleaner and error messages printed also self sufficient.

> +
> +static void help(char *name)
> +{
> +       puts("");
> +       printf("usage: %s [-h] [-b vcpu bytes] [-s mem type]\n",
> +              name);
> +       puts("");
> +       printf(" -b: specify the size of the memory region which should be\n"
> +              "     dirtied by each vCPU. e.g. 10M or 3G.\n"
> +              "     (default: 1G)\n");
> +       backing_src_help("-s");
> +       puts("");
> +       exit(0);

This should not be exit(0) if a user passed the wrong option.

> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> +       int opt;
> +
> +       TEST_REQUIRE(get_kvm_param_bool("eager_page_split"));
> +       TEST_REQUIRE(get_kvm_param_bool("tdp_mmu"));
> +
> +       while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "b:hs:")) != -1) {
> +               switch (opt) {
> +               case 'b':
> +                       guest_percpu_mem_size = parse_size(optarg);
> +                       break;
> +               case 's':
> +                       backing_src = parse_backing_src_type(optarg);
> +                       break;
> +               case 'h':
> +               default:
> +                       help(argv[0]);
> +                       break;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       if (!is_backing_src_hugetlb(backing_src)) {
> +               pr_info("This test will only work reliably with HugeTLB memory. "
> +                       "It can work with THP, but that is best effort.");
> +               return KSFT_SKIP;
> +       }
> +
> +       guest_modes_append_default();
> +
> +       dirty_log_manual_caps = 0;
> +       for_each_guest_mode(run_test, NULL);
> +
> +       dirty_log_manual_caps =
> +               kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2);

Shouldn't the check be done in the beginning and skip the test f it is
not supported?

> +       dirty_log_manual_caps &= (KVM_DIRTY_LOG_MANUAL_PROTECT_ENABLE |
> +                                 KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET);
> +       for_each_guest_mode(run_test, NULL);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> --
> 2.39.1.405.gd4c25cc71f-goog
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists