linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64/ftrace: Add support for DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:00:12 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, lenb@...nel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mhiramat@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com, ojeda@...nel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
        revest@...omium.org, robert.moore@...el.com, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64/ftrace: Add support for
 DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS

On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:49:52 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:40:29 +0000
> Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Mark,
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:45:55PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:  
> > > I'm not sure how we want to merge this, so I've moved the core ftrace
> > > patch to the start of the series so that it can more easily be placed on
> > > a stable branch if we want that to go via the ftrace tree and the rest
> > > to go via arm64.    
> > 
> > Happy to queue the whole series since Steve acked the ftrace changes.
> > But I'll put on a stable branch in case there are any conflicts with the
> > ftrace tree.
> >   
> 
> I actually do have a conflict with this patch (I'll post it soon).
> 
> I could just cherry pick it from your tree. Linus seems to be OK with that
> when it's just a single change.

Forget about it. I'll post the patch, but it's not important (we need it
mostly for something internal, but could possibly be useful to others). It
can wait a merge window or two to apply it.

So feel free to take this through your tree, and then I'll add my patch in
the merge window after that.

-- Steve