[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb1cab9f-a373-38e6-92e6-456332010653@gnuweeb.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:02:22 +0700
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: the x86 sysret_rip test fails on the Intel FRED architecture
On 1/23/23 6:45 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> static enum regs_ok check_regs_syscall(int syscall,
> unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2)
> {
>
> register unsigned long r11 asm("%r11");
> unsigned long rcx, rbx, tmp;
tmp is unused.
> r11 = r11_sentinel;
> rcx = rcx_sentinel;
>
> asm volatile("push %3; popf; "
> "lea 1f(%%rip),%2; "
> "syscall; "
> "1:"
> : "+r" (r11), "+c" (rcx), "=b" (rbx)
> : "g" (rflags_sentinel),
> "a" (syscall), "D" (arg1), "S" (arg2));
BTW, I just realized this "push" is unsafe for userspace code if the
compiler decides to inline this inside a leaf function that uses the
redzone.
Reason: Because this "push;" clobbers redzone.
It doesn't always happen, but when that happens it can be confusing to
debug.
A simple workaround is: just compile it with "-mno-red-zone" flag.
Alternative, without using that flag, maybe preserve the value like:
movq -8(%rsp), %r12
pushq %[rflags_sentinel]
popf
movq %r12, -8(%rsp)
syscall
with "r12" and "memory" added to the clobber list.
What do you think?
--
Ammar Faizi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists