lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACMJSevdzO7QuYqQ8B1QoAPC5CUW--+AeDm2dHbf1TGGL0=aMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:46:28 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree

On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 03:18, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tty tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c: In function 'setup_fifos':
> drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c:1058:17: error: 'struct qcom_geni_serial_port' has no member named 'rx_fifo'
>  1058 |         if (port->rx_fifo && (old_rx_fifo_depth != port->rx_fifo_depth) && port->rx_fifo_depth) {
>       |                 ^~
> drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c:1059:21: error: 'struct qcom_geni_serial_port' has no member named 'rx_fifo'
>  1059 |                 port->rx_fifo = devm_krealloc(uport->dev, port->rx_fifo,
>       |                     ^~
> drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c:1059:63: error: 'struct qcom_geni_serial_port' has no member named 'rx_fifo'
>  1059 |                 port->rx_fifo = devm_krealloc(uport->dev, port->rx_fifo,
>       |                                                               ^~
> drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c:1062:26: error: 'struct qcom_geni_serial_port' has no member named 'rx_fifo'
>  1062 |                 if (!port->rx_fifo)
>       |                          ^~
>
> Caused by commit
>
>   2aaa43c70778 ("tty: serial: qcom-geni-serial: add support for serial engine DMA")
>
> interacting with commit
>
>   b8caf69a6946 ("tty: serial: qcom-geni-serial: fix slab-out-of-bounds on RX FIFO buffer")
>
> from Linus' tree.
>
> I have applied the following merge fix patch for today (I am not sure
> if it is actually correct, but it builds).
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 13:09:27 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] tty: fix up for "tty: serial: qcom-geni-serial: add support
>  for serial engine DMA"
>
> interacting with "tty: serial: qcom-geni-serial: fix slab-out-of-bounds
> on RX FIFO buffer".
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
> index d98e0a8aae7c..61350007bf1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
> @@ -1055,11 +1055,11 @@ static int setup_fifos(struct qcom_geni_serial_port *port)
>         uport->fifosize =
>                 (port->tx_fifo_depth * port->tx_fifo_width) / BITS_PER_BYTE;
>
> -       if (port->rx_fifo && (old_rx_fifo_depth != port->rx_fifo_depth) && port->rx_fifo_depth) {
> -               port->rx_fifo = devm_krealloc(uport->dev, port->rx_fifo,
> +       if (port->rx_buf && (old_rx_fifo_depth != port->rx_fifo_depth) && port->rx_fifo_depth) {
> +               port->rx_buf = devm_krealloc(uport->dev, port->rx_buf,
>                                               port->rx_fifo_depth * sizeof(u32),
>                                               GFP_KERNEL);
> -               if (!port->rx_fifo)
> +               if (!port->rx_buf)
>                         return -ENOMEM;
>         }
>
> --
> 2.35.1
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

This looks fine and works fine:

Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ