linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 09/12] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add SM8550 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y85lFD3m5pdpNtdR@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 12:44:36 +0200
From:   Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        "vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/12] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add SM8550 compatible

On 23-01-22 15:10:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/01/2023 15:04, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > Add the SM8550 platform to the binding.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > 
> > The v3 of this patchset is:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230119112453.3393911-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org/
> > 
> > Changes since v3:
> >  * renamed noc_aggr to noc_aggr_4, as found in the driver
> > 
> > Changes since v2:
> >  * dropped the pipe from clock-names
> >  * removed the pcie instance number from aggre clock-names comment
> >  * renamed aggre clock-names to noc_aggr
> >  * dropped the _pcie infix from cnoc_pcie_sf_axi
> >  * renamed pcie_1_link_down_reset to simply link_down
> >  * added enable-gpios back, since pcie1 node will use it
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> >  * Switched to single compatible for both PCIes (qcom,pcie-sm8550)
> >  * dropped enable-gpios property
> >  * dropped interconnects related properties, the power-domains
> >  * properties
> >    and resets related properties the sm8550 specific allOf:if:then
> >  * dropped pipe_mux, phy_pipe and ref clocks from the sm8550 specific
> >    allOf:if:then clock-names array and decreased the minItems and
> >    maxItems for clocks property accordingly
> >  * added "minItems: 1" to interconnects, since sm8550 pcie uses just
> >  * one,
> >    same for interconnect-names
> > 
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml    | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
> > index a5859bb3dc28..58f926666332 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
> > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ properties:
> >        - qcom,pcie-sm8250
> >        - qcom,pcie-sm8450-pcie0
> >        - qcom,pcie-sm8450-pcie1
> > +      - qcom,pcie-sm8550
> >        - qcom,pcie-ipq6018
> >  
> >    reg:
> > @@ -65,9 +66,11 @@ properties:
> >    dma-coherent: true
> >  
> >    interconnects:
> > +    minItems: 1
> >      maxItems: 2
> >  
> 
> I don't see my concerns from v3 answered.

Check the dates for v4 and your reply to v3.

v4 was sent a day before you sent your v3 comments. :)

> 
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> 
> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
> requested changes or keep discussing them.

Will address your comments in next version.

> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>