[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86cz75mr3t.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:23:50 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vikram Sethi <vsethi@...dia.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix soft lockup during VM teardown
On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 15:35:48 +0000,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/20/23 06:00, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > What I am asking agin is: is there any overlap between any vgic ioctl
> > and the teardown of the VM? Do you ever see kvm_vm_release() being
> > called before kvm_device_release()?
> >
> > Because that's the overlap I've been talking all along.
>
> I've not observed overlap of kvm_vm_release() with ioctls
> kvm_device_ioctl(), kvm_vcpu_ioctl() and kvm_vm_ioctl() for
> 3hrs. Test created hundreds of VMs and teardowns.
OK, that's reassuring. Thanks for looking into this.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists