linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: restrict drivers per ARM/ARM64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <33f82972-abba-3ca7-b7d5-6aff36d48e5e@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 13:47:21 +0100
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: restrict drivers per ARM/ARM64



On 23.01.2023 13:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/01/2023 13:31, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23.01.2023 10:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> There is no point to allow selecting pin-controller drivers for Qualcomm
>>> ARMv7 SoCs when building ARM64 kernel, and vice versa.  This makes
>>> kernel configuration more difficult as many do not remember the Qualcomm
>>> SoCs model names/numbers.  There won't be a single image for ARMv7 and
>>> ARMv8/9 SoCs, so no features/options are lost.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>> Not sure about the newest of the newest SoCs with Cortex-X etc,
>> but older ones, particularly including 8916 (as some vendors
>> in their infinite wisdom decided that shipping a 32 bit tz is
>> a good idea) having ARM || ARM64 would make sense.
> 
> Why? ARM || ARM64 is implied by ARCH_QCOM, so what would it give?
Err.. my mistake.. I skipped over your patch too quickly and
didn't notice you did not in fact touch 8916.. Sorry..

Konrad
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>