linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Fix full name of the GPL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2281101.Yu7Ql3qPJb@prancing-pony>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:43:27 +0100
From:   Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
To:     Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        "open list:WATCHDOG DEVICE DRIVERS" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Fix full name of the GPL

On Sunday, 22 January 2023 20:45:13 CET Guenter Roeck wrote:
> No. The only acceptable change would be to replace the text with the
> SPDX license identifier. However, the code is not specific declaring
> _which_ license is being used (2.0 only or 2.0+ or even 1.0+).
> Given that, the only entity who can change the license text in this
> file would be the license holder (which is presumably why it wasn't
> touched when the SPDX conversion was made).

You are entirely correct and my initial view of it as a spelling issue, was 
wrong. Please disregard the patch.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)