linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 03/14] rtc: pcf2127: adapt for alarm registers at any offset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230123110252.c883b73e4cf733bb2aaa7253@hugovil.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:02:52 -0500
From:   Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     a.zummo@...ertech.it, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/14] rtc: pcf2127: adapt for alarm registers at any
 offset

On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 18:10:36 +0100
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> wrote:

> On 15/12/2022 10:02:04-0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> > 
> > This will simplify the implementation of new variants into this driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c
> > index fb0caacaabee..db0cb784c0c9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c
> > @@ -56,11 +56,14 @@
> >  /* Time and date registers bits */
> >  #define PCF2127_BIT_SC_OSF			BIT(7)
> >  /* Alarm registers */
> > -#define PCF2127_REG_ALARM_SC		0x0A
> > -#define PCF2127_REG_ALARM_MN		0x0B
> > -#define PCF2127_REG_ALARM_HR		0x0C
> > -#define PCF2127_REG_ALARM_DM		0x0D
> > -#define PCF2127_REG_ALARM_DW		0x0E
> > +#define PCF2127_REG_ALARM_BASE		0x0A
> > +/* Alarm registers offsets (starting from base register) */
> > +#define PCF2127_OFFSET_ALARM_SC		0
> > +#define PCF2127_OFFSET_ALARM_MN		1
> > +#define PCF2127_OFFSET_ALARM_HR		2
> > +#define PCF2127_OFFSET_ALARM_DM		3
> > +#define PCF2127_OFFSET_ALARM_DW		4
> > +/* Alarm bits */
> >  #define PCF2127_BIT_ALARM_AE			BIT(7)
> >  /* CLKOUT control register */
> >  #define PCF2127_REG_CLKOUT		0x0f
> > @@ -110,6 +113,7 @@ struct pcf21xx_config {
> >  	unsigned int has_nvmem:1;
> >  	unsigned int has_bit_wd_ctl_cd0:1;
> >  	u8 regs_td_base; /* Time/data base registers. */
> > +	u8 regs_alarm_base; /* Alarm function base registers. */
> >  };
> >  
> >  struct pcf2127 {
> > @@ -402,18 +406,18 @@ static int pcf2127_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > -	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pcf2127->regmap, PCF2127_REG_ALARM_SC, buf,
> > -			       sizeof(buf));
> > +	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pcf2127->regmap, pcf2127->cfg->regs_alarm_base,
> > +			       buf, sizeof(buf));
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> >  	alrm->enabled = ctrl2 & PCF2127_BIT_CTRL2_AIE;
> >  	alrm->pending = ctrl2 & PCF2127_BIT_CTRL2_AF;
> >  
> > -	alrm->time.tm_sec = bcd2bin(buf[0] & 0x7F);
> > -	alrm->time.tm_min = bcd2bin(buf[1] & 0x7F);
> > -	alrm->time.tm_hour = bcd2bin(buf[2] & 0x3F);
> > -	alrm->time.tm_mday = bcd2bin(buf[3] & 0x3F);
> > +	alrm->time.tm_sec = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_ALARM_SC] & 0x7F);
> > +	alrm->time.tm_min = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_ALARM_MN] & 0x7F);
> > +	alrm->time.tm_hour = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_ALARM_HR] & 0x3F);
> > +	alrm->time.tm_mday = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_ALARM_DM] & 0x3F);
> 
> I feel like this is adding defines for the sake of having defines. I
> don't think this is particularly useful.

Ok, done.

> 
> 
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -447,14 +451,14 @@ static int pcf2127_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > -	buf[0] = bin2bcd(alrm->time.tm_sec);
> > -	buf[1] = bin2bcd(alrm->time.tm_min);
> > -	buf[2] = bin2bcd(alrm->time.tm_hour);
> > -	buf[3] = bin2bcd(alrm->time.tm_mday);
> > -	buf[4] = PCF2127_BIT_ALARM_AE; /* Do not match on week day */
> > +	buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_ALARM_SC] = bin2bcd(alrm->time.tm_sec);
> > +	buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_ALARM_MN] = bin2bcd(alrm->time.tm_min);
> > +	buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_ALARM_HR] = bin2bcd(alrm->time.tm_hour);
> > +	buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_ALARM_DM] = bin2bcd(alrm->time.tm_mday);
> > +	buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_ALARM_DW] = PCF2127_BIT_ALARM_AE; /* Do not match on week day */
> >  
> > -	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pcf2127->regmap, PCF2127_REG_ALARM_SC, buf,
> > -				sizeof(buf));
> > +	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pcf2127->regmap, pcf2127->cfg->regs_alarm_base,
> > +				buf, sizeof(buf));
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > @@ -659,12 +663,14 @@ static struct pcf21xx_config pcf21xx_cfg[] = {
> >  		.has_nvmem = 1,
> >  		.has_bit_wd_ctl_cd0 = 1,
> >  		.regs_td_base = PCF2127_REG_TIME_DATE_BASE,
> > +		.regs_alarm_base = PCF2127_REG_ALARM_BASE,
> >  	},
> >  	[PCF2129] = {
> >  		.max_register = 0x19,
> >  		.has_nvmem = 0,
> >  		.has_bit_wd_ctl_cd0 = 0,
> >  		.regs_td_base = PCF2127_REG_TIME_DATE_BASE,
> > +		.regs_alarm_base = PCF2127_REG_ALARM_BASE,
> >  	},
> >  };
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.30.2
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
> 


-- 
Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>