linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] udf: Fix full name of the GPL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230123161432.tcbq745zw32yibr3@quack3>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:14:32 +0100
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udf: Fix full name of the GPL

On Mon 23-01-23 16:58:22, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Monday, 23 January 2023 16:48:39 CET Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Sun 22-01-23 20:16:03, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
> > > ---
> > > fs/udf/ecma_167.h | 2 +-
> > > fs/udf/osta_udf.h | 2 +-
> > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Thanks. I've added the patch to my tree.
> 
> While I initially saw it as a spelling error, I've since changed my view that 
> it would actually be changing the license and I'm not qualified to do that.
> See https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2281101.Yu7Ql3qPJb@prancing-pony/
> 
> While it seemed reasonable to *assume* that the GNU General Public License was 
> meant, I (now) think that is not sufficient when it comes to legal/license 
> material, which this is. I think, but I'm not a lawyer.
> 
> So maybe it's better to remove/revert it from your tree?

OK, let's err on the safe side ;) Patch removed.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR