[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <318138.1674491927@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:38:47 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] iov_iter: Improve page extraction (ref, pin or just list)
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> Why do we want to track that information on a per-page basis? Wouldn't it
> be easier to have a VM_NOCOW flag in vma->vm_flags? Set it the first
> time somebody does an O_DIRECT read or RDMA pin. That's it. Pages in
> that VMA will now never be COWed, regardless of their refcount/mapcount.
> And the whole "did we pin or get this page" problem goes away. Along
> with folio->pincount.
Wouldn't that potentially make someone's entire malloc() heap entirely NOCOW
if they did a single DIO to/from it.
Also you only mention DIO read - but what about "start DIO write; fork(); touch
buffer" in the parent - now the write buffer belongs to the child and they can
affect the parent's write.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists