[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a5019bd-8666-45b1-bcaa-e3bacc869bc8@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:02:36 +0000
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, acme@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: cs-etm: Improve missing sink warning message
On 23/01/2023 16:11, James Clark wrote:
> Make the sink error message more similar to the event error message that
> reminds about missing kernel support. The available sinks are also
> determined by the hardware so mention that too.
>
> Also, usually it's not necessary to specify the sink, so add that as a
> hint.
>
> Now the error for a made up sink looks like this:
>
> $ perf record -e cs_etm/@.../
> Couldn't find sink "abc" on event cs_etm/@.../.
> Missing kernel or device support? Errno: 2 (No such file or directory)
>
> Hint: An appropriate sink will picked automatically if none is specified.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
> ---
> tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> index 481e170cd3f1..c6195a7a3cbf 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> @@ -283,7 +283,9 @@ static int cs_etm_set_sink_attr(struct perf_pmu *pmu,
>
> ret = perf_pmu__scan_file(pmu, path, "%x", &hash);
> if (ret != 1) {
> - pr_err("failed to set sink \"%s\" on event %s with %d (%s)\n",
> + pr_err("Couldn't find sink \"%s\" on event %s\n"
Could this be tied to "errno == ENOENT" ? Otherwise, this could be
guiding the user to wrong direction.
> + "Missing kernel or device support? errno: %d (%s)\n\n"
> + "Hint: An appropriate sink will picked automatically if one isn't specified.\n",
minor nit: "... sink will *be* picked.." ?
Otherwise, looks good to me.
Suzuki
> sink, evsel__name(evsel), errno,
> str_error_r(errno, msg, sizeof(msg)));
> return ret;
>
> base-commit: 5670ebf54bd26482f57a094c53bdc562c106e0a9
Powered by blists - more mailing lists