lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 19:08:03 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Stefan Hansson <newbyte@...tmarketos.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        soc@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        matti.lehtimaki@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add MSM8926 and Samsung
 Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 LTE

On 23/01/2023 18:41, Stefan Hansson wrote:
>>>
>>> 2. You base on other SoC but you do not include its compatibles. Why? Is
>>> it intended? None of the properties applicable to other SoC will match
>>> here, thus I actually wonder if you run dtbs_check...
> 
> Sorry, I forgot about running dtbs_check. However, I'm not sure I 
> understand the question. What do you mean by that I don't include its 
> compatibles?

I understood you include the msm8226.dtsi which is a different SoC. If
you include it, you get all of its content. We do it only for compatible
devices, but your device does not indicate compatibility with msm8226.

> 
> I ran `$ make dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qcom.yaml` locally just now, 
> and it only gave me errors from the qcom-msm8974pro-oneplus-bacon dtb. 
> Maybe I'm running it wrong?

No clue, I cannot test because your patches do not apply cleanly.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ