[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff598dd3-91d0-b660-7821-e34177056954@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 19:09:46 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...nel.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] thermal/drivers/intel: Use generic trip points for
intel_soc_dts_iosf
Hi Srinivas,
On 19/01/2023 21:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 7:16 PM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...nel.org>
>>
>> The thermal framework gives the possibility to register the trip
>> points with the thermal zone. When that is done, no get_trip_* ops are
>> needed and they can be removed.
>>
>> Convert ops content logic into generic trip points and register them with the
>> thermal zone.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>> ---
[ ... ]
>>
>> @@ -320,7 +304,8 @@ static int add_dts_thermal_zone(int id, struct intel_soc_dts_sensor_entry *dts,
>> dts->trip_mask = trip_mask;
>> dts->trip_count = trip_count;
>> snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "soc_dts%d", id);
>> - dts->tzone = thermal_zone_device_register(name,
>> + dts->tzone = thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips(name,
>> + dts->trips,
>> trip_count,
>> trip_mask,
>> dts, &tzone_ops,
>> @@ -430,27 +415,28 @@ struct intel_soc_dts_sensors *intel_soc_dts_iosf_init(
>> notification = false;
>> else
>> notification = true;
>> - for (i = 0; i < SOC_MAX_DTS_SENSORS; ++i) {
>> - sensors->soc_dts[i].sensors = sensors;
>> - ret = add_dts_thermal_zone(i, &sensors->soc_dts[i],
>> - notification, trip_count,
>> - read_only_trip_count);
>> - if (ret)
>> - goto err_free;
>> - }
>
> How is this change related to the rest of the patch?
We want to register the thermal zone with the trip points.
thermal_zone_device_register() becomes
thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips()
But in the current code, the trip points are updated after the thermal
zones are created (and strictly speaking it is wrong as get_trip_temp
can be invoked before the trip points are updated).
So the change inverts the initialization where we update the trip points
and then we register the thermal zones.
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < SOC_MAX_DTS_SENSORS; ++i) {
>> ret = update_trip_temp(&sensors->soc_dts[i], 0, 0,
>> THERMAL_TRIP_PASSIVE);
>> if (ret)
>> - goto err_remove_zone;
>> + goto err_free;
>>
>> ret = update_trip_temp(&sensors->soc_dts[i], 1, 0,
>> THERMAL_TRIP_PASSIVE);
>> if (ret)
>> - goto err_remove_zone;
>> + goto err_free;
>> }
>>
>> + for (i = 0; i < SOC_MAX_DTS_SENSORS; ++i) {
>> + sensors->soc_dts[i].sensors = sensors;
>> + ret = add_dts_thermal_zone(i, &sensors->soc_dts[i],
>> + notification, trip_count,
>> + read_only_trip_count);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_remove_zone;
>> + }
>> +
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists