linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bic_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230124000925.pfosl6pfuhjyggbp@shindev>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:09:25 +0000
From:   Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
To:     Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
CC:     "jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>, "tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
        "josef@...icpanda.com" <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "paolo.valente@...aro.org" <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        "cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "yukuai1@...weicloud.com" <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>,
        "yi.zhang@...wei.com" <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
        "yangerkun@...wei.com" <yangerkun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bic_set_bfqq()

On Jan 13, 2023 / 17:44, Yu Kuai wrote:
> After commit 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'"),
> bic->bfqq will be accessed in bic_set_bfqq(), however, in some context
> bic->bfqq will be freed first, and bic_set_bfqq() is called with the freed
> bic->bfqq.
> 
> Fix the problem by always freeing bfqq after bic_set_bfqq().
> 
> Fixes: 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'")
> Reported-and-tested-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> ---
>  block/bfq-cgroup.c  | 2 +-
>  block/bfq-iosched.c | 4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
> index a6e8da5f5cfd..feb13ac25557 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
> @@ -749,8 +749,8 @@ static void bfq_sync_bfqq_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
>  		 * old cgroup.
>  		 */
>  		bfq_put_cooperator(sync_bfqq);
> -		bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, sync_bfqq);
>  		bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, true, act_idx);
> +		bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, sync_bfqq);
>  	}
>  }
>  

Yu, thanks for posting this fix, but it can not be applied to v6.2-rc5. The
hunk above looks different from the patch I tested. Could you take a look?

-- 
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki