[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9AK+yW7mZ2SNMcj@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 08:44:43 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/10] block: Switch to pinning pages.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 03:03:53PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > It can't. Per your latest branch:
>
> Yes it can. Patch 6:
This never involves the cleanup mode as input. And as I pointed out
in the other mail, there is no need for the FOLL_ flags on the
cleanup side. You can just check the bio flag in bio_release_apges
and call either put_page or unpin_user_page on that. The direct
callers of bio_release_page never mix them pin and get cases anyway.
Let me find some time to code this up if it's easier to understand
that way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists