linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: Switch back to sync probe to fix rootfs mount regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y9ARdPA4vckTQ4GP@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2023 19:12:20 +0200
From:   Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
        Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: Switch back to sync probe to fix rootfs mount
 regression

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:56:30AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 02:41:34PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:47:59AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:21:40AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > Err, no.  We're not going to randomly revert things.  If you want
> > > > to be productive check the one liner Keith reported in reply to the
> > > > last report.
> > > 
> > > No idea what that previous report is. Care to share a link?
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/849c43bc-7488-72a6-f6fc-8700639b0c79@leemhuis.info/T/#m759092f541ea29fcb41911890307e70868636a45
> > 
> > Patch to test:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/849c43bc-7488-72a6-f6fc-8700639b0c79@leemhuis.info/T/#md13c22b29cd81bd0ce9167c271c582005ba30550
> 
> I'll post the official patch if someone can let me know if it's
> successful. Or I can potentially setup a VM to verify myself, but I
> probably won't be able to get to that till next week.

Appears to work here. I threw a tested-by to the original thread.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel