linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Performance fixes for 9p filesystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y89HQXu90ea6Ed4r@codewreck.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:49:37 +0900
From:   asmadeus@...ewreck.org
To:     evanhensbergen@...oud.com
Cc:     Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>,
        Zhengchao Shao via V9fs-developer 
        <v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        Ron Minnich <rminnich@...il.com>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Performance fixes for 9p filesystem

evanhensbergen@...oud.com wrote on Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:33:46PM -0600:
> I’m fine with funneling these through Dominique since he’s currently
> the active maintainer, but I’ve also re-established kernel.org
> <http://kernel.org/> credentials so I can field the pull-request if
> desired.

I'm happy either way; I've had a (too quick to really call review) look
at the code itself and it mostly makes sense to me, and as you pointed
out some would warrant a Cc stable@ and not waiting if I had time to do
this seriously, but I'm not sure I'll make it if this needs to wait for
me.

Do you also have a tree that goes in -next ? I think I asked before but
lost your reply, sorry.
If not it'll probably be easier for me to pick it up this cycle, but
that's about the only reason I'd see for me to take the patches as
things stand.

-- 
Dominique