linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH mm] kasan: reset page tags properly with sampling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2023 13:11:22 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
Cc:     andrey.konovalov@...ux.dev, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm] kasan: reset page tags properly with sampling

On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 21:46:51 +0100 Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 9:45 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 21:35:26 +0100 andrey.konovalov@...ux.dev wrote:
> >
> > > The implementation of page_alloc poisoning sampling assumed that
> > > tag_clear_highpage resets page tags for __GFP_ZEROTAGS allocations.
> > > However, this is no longer the case since commit 70c248aca9e7
> > > ("mm: kasan: Skip unpoisoning of user pages").
> > >
> > > This leads to kernel crashes when MTE-enabled userspace mappings are
> > > used with Hardware Tag-Based KASAN enabled.
> > >
> > > Reset page tags for __GFP_ZEROTAGS allocations in post_alloc_hook().
> > >
> > > Also clarify and fix related comments.
> >
> > I assume this is a fix against 44383cef54c0 ("kasan: allow sampling
> > page_alloc allocations for HW_TAGS") which is presently in mm-stable,
> > yes?
> 
> Correct. I assumed I shouldn't include a Fixes tag, as the patch is
> not in the mainline.

I think it's best to add the Fixes: if it's known.  If the patch was in
mm-unstable then I'd just fold the fix into the base patch, but a
Fixes: is still helpful because it tells people (especially me) which
patch needs the fix.

If the patch is in mm-stable then the SHA is stable and the Fixes: is
desirable for people who are backporting the base patch into earlier
kernels - hopefully when doing this they know to search the tree for
other patches which fix the patch which they are backporting.