linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Fixes for kmemleak tracking with CMA regions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y9BMXq36fZ/xppbD@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2023 13:23:42 -0800
From:   Isaac Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@...gle.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Fixes for kmemleak tracking with CMA regions

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:20:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:48:57 +0000 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for digging this out. This patch shouldn't have ended up upstream
> > (commit 972fa3a7c17c "mm: kmemleak: alloc gray object for reserved
> > region with direct map"). I thought both Calvin Zhang and I agreed that
> > it's not the correct approach (not even sure there was a real problem to
> > fix).
> > 
> > Do you still get the any faults with the above commit reverted? I'd
> > prefer this if it works rather than adding unnecessary
> > kmemleak_alloc/free callbacks that pretty much cancel each-other.
> > 
> > > I'm not sure if that commit is appropriate, given that reserved regions
> > > that still have their direct mappings intact may be used for DMA, which
> > > isn't appropriate for kmemleak scanning.
> > 
> > It's not. I think it should be reverted.
> 
> Could someone please send along a patch to revert this, along
> with the explanation for doing so?  And please consider a cc:stable.
Yes, I can send a revert patch later today. My patches that are
currently in mm-unstable depend on this patch though, so those would
have to be dropped from that branch as well.

--Isaac