[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230125083647.34067ee1@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:36:47 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with Linus' tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm64/Kconfig
between commit:
68a63a412d18 ("arm64: Fix build with CC=clang, CONFIG_FTRACE=y and CONFIG_STACK_TRACER=y")
from Linus' tree and commit:
baaf553d3bc3 ("arm64: Implement HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS")
from the arm64 tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/arm64/Kconfig
index c5ccca26a408,de052d935832..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@@ -184,6 -186,10 +186,8 @@@ config ARM6
select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS
select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
- select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS \
- if $(cc-option,-fpatchable-function-entry=2)
+ select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS \
+ if (DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS && !CFI_CLANG)
select FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY \
if DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists