[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a359748-e53c-a178-de09-2c999eb69013@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 02:21:31 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Vinod Polimera <quic_vpolimer@...cinc.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robdclark@...il.com,
dianders@...omium.org, swboyd@...omium.org,
quic_kalyant@...cinc.com, quic_khsieh@...cinc.com,
quic_vproddut@...cinc.com, quic_bjorande@...cinc.com,
quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend v11 05/15] drm/msm/dp: disable self_refresh_aware
after entering psr
On 19/01/2023 16:26, Vinod Polimera wrote:
> From: Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>
>
> Updated frames get queued if self_refresh_aware is set when the
> sink is in psr. To support bridge enable and avoid queuing of update
> frames, reset the self_refresh_aware state after entering psr.
I'm not convinced by this change. E.g. analogix code doesn't do this.
Could you please clarify, why do you need to toggle the
self_refresh_aware flag?
>
> Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Polimera <quic_vpolimer@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> index 029e08c..92d1a1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ static void edp_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
> struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state;
> struct msm_dp_bridge *dp_bridge = to_dp_bridge(drm_bridge);
> struct msm_dp *dp = dp_bridge->dp_display;
> + struct drm_connector *connector;
> + struct drm_connector_state *conn_state = NULL;
>
> /*
> * Check the old state of the crtc to determine if the panel
> @@ -150,10 +152,22 @@ static void edp_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
>
> if (old_crtc_state && old_crtc_state->self_refresh_active) {
> dp_display_set_psr(dp, false);
> - return;
> + goto psr_aware;
> }
>
> dp_bridge_atomic_enable(drm_bridge, old_bridge_state);
> +
> +psr_aware:
> + connector = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder(atomic_state,
> + drm_bridge->encoder);
> + if (connector)
> + conn_state = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state(atomic_state,
> + connector);
> +
> + if (conn_state) {
> + conn_state->self_refresh_aware = dp->psr_supported;
> + }
No need to wrap a single line statement in brackets.
> +
> }
>
> static void edp_bridge_atomic_disable(struct drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
> @@ -164,6 +178,14 @@ static void edp_bridge_atomic_disable(struct drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
> struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state = NULL, *old_crtc_state = NULL;
> struct msm_dp_bridge *dp_bridge = to_dp_bridge(drm_bridge);
> struct msm_dp *dp = dp_bridge->dp_display;
> + struct drm_connector *connector;
> + struct drm_connector_state *conn_state = NULL;
> +
> + connector = drm_atomic_get_old_connector_for_encoder(atomic_state,
> + drm_bridge->encoder);
> + if (connector)
> + conn_state = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state(atomic_state,
> + connector);
>
> crtc = drm_atomic_get_old_crtc_for_encoder(atomic_state,
> drm_bridge->encoder);
> @@ -190,6 +212,9 @@ static void edp_bridge_atomic_disable(struct drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
> * when display disable occurs while the sink is in psr state.
> */
> if (new_crtc_state->self_refresh_active) {
> + if (conn_state)
> + conn_state->self_refresh_aware = false;
> +
> dp_display_set_psr(dp, true);
> return;
> } else if (old_crtc_state->self_refresh_active) {
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists