[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABXOdTeFw_puhp5t=UUWLwrtqaoLo9ys6Z8r9Gd4HXZ3te8jdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 22:56:54 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>
To: Victor Ding <victording@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
dustin@...ett.net, lee.jones@...aro.org, bleung@...omium.org,
dnojiri@...omium.org, sebastian.reichel@...labora.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, pmalani@...omium.org,
gustavoars@...nel.org, groeck@...omium.org,
enric.balletbo@...labora.com, tinghan.shen@...iatek.com,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, tzungbi@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: allow deferred probe
of switch handles
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:16 PM Victor Ding <victording@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> `fwnode_typec_{retimer,mux,switch}_get()` could return `-EPROBE_DEFER`,
> which is called from `cros_typec_get_switch_handles`. When this happens,
> it does not indicate absence of switches; instead, it only hints that
> probing of switches should occur at a later time.
>
> Progagate `-EPROBE_DEFER` to upper layer logic so that they can re-try
> probing switches as a better time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Victor Ding <victording@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Coverted switch-block to nested if-blocks.
>
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> index 59de4ce01fab..580f3bdf091c 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> @@ -145,31 +145,37 @@ static int cros_typec_get_switch_handles(struct cros_typec_port *port,
> struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> struct device *dev)
> {
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> port->mux = fwnode_typec_mux_get(fwnode, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(port->mux)) {
> - dev_dbg(dev, "Mux handle not found.\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(port->mux);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Mux handle not found: %d.\n", ret);
> goto mux_err;
> }
>
> port->retimer = fwnode_typec_retimer_get(fwnode);
> if (IS_ERR(port->retimer)) {
> - dev_dbg(dev, "Retimer handle not found.\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(port->retimer);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Retimer handle not found: %d.\n", ret);
> goto retimer_sw_err;
> }
>
> port->ori_sw = fwnode_typec_switch_get(fwnode);
> if (IS_ERR(port->ori_sw)) {
> - dev_dbg(dev, "Orientation switch handle not found.\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(port->ori_sw);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Orientation switch handle not found: %d\n", ret);
> goto ori_sw_err;
> }
>
> port->role_sw = fwnode_usb_role_switch_get(fwnode);
> if (IS_ERR(port->role_sw)) {
> - dev_dbg(dev, "USB role switch handle not found.\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(port->role_sw);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "USB role switch handle not found: %d\n", ret);
> goto role_sw_err;
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
>
This change is pointless.
Guenter
> role_sw_err:
> typec_switch_put(port->ori_sw);
> @@ -181,7 +187,7 @@ static int cros_typec_get_switch_handles(struct cros_typec_port *port,
> typec_mux_put(port->mux);
> port->mux = NULL;
> mux_err:
> - return -ENODEV;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int cros_typec_add_partner(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num,
> @@ -423,9 +429,11 @@ static int cros_typec_init_ports(struct cros_typec_data *typec)
> }
>
> ret = cros_typec_get_switch_handles(cros_port, fwnode, dev);
> - if (ret)
> - dev_dbg(dev, "No switch control for port %d\n",
> - port_num);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "No switch control for port %d, err: %d\n", port_num, ret);
> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + goto unregister_ports;
> + }
>
> ret = cros_typec_register_port_altmodes(typec, port_num);
> if (ret) {
> --
> 2.39.1.405.gd4c25cc71f-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists