[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <955f4b2a-a750-11a2-0423-72023935723b@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 09:17:12 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Tony Huang <tonyhuang.sunplus@...il.com>,
Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911@...il.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: mmc: correct pwrseq node names
On 20/01/2023 10:38, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Freitag, 20. Januar 2023, 09:57:22 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>> Node names should be generic and should not contain underscores.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-emmc.yaml | 2 +-
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-sd8787.yaml | 2 +-
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-simple.yaml | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-emmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-emmc.yaml
>> index 911a5996e099..588be73168fa 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-emmc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-pwrseq-emmc.yaml
>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ additionalProperties: false
>> examples:
>> - |
>> #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>> - sdhci0_pwrseq {
>> + pwrseq {
>
> [applicable for all 3 examples]
>
> hmm, power-sequences are not necessarily tied to an address and I guess
> it will be very much a common case to have multiple ones on a system.
>
> So might it be better to follow other patterns (like leds) to number them
> or suggest a "foo-pwrseq" / "pwrseq-foo"?
In such cases one can add number or descriptive suffix (pwrseq-0,
pwrseq-foo), just like we do for regulators. However the examples have
here only one node and in such case "pwrseq" is enough.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists