[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <578e034a-d75f-3b50-76dd-8eb90a127258@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 08:46:41 +0000
From: <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To: <me@...ux.beauty>
CC: <lchen@...arella.com>, <arnd@...db.de>, <heiko@...ech.de>,
<lkundrak@...sk>, <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>, <sven@...npeter.dev>,
<zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>, <briannorris@...omium.org>,
<hasegawa-hitomi@...itsu.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] soc: add Ambarella driver
Hey,
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/ambarella/Makefile
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>> +
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_AMBARELLA) += soc.o
>>
>> The subdirectory is already gated by this symbol, so is there much point
>> gating it on the same one again?
>
> Yeah, it lookgs kind of redundant now, but I will upstream other drivers after
> this series get merged, which are not gated by this symbol.
You could make the directory by obj-y, and therefore always included,
and have various drivers controlled by their own Kconfig symbols.
Or else, you could leave the directory controlled by ARCH_AMBARELLA
and make the above `obj-y += soc.o` instead, since it's always
going to be built if the directory is included.
Thanks,
Conor.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists