[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5eb9d67-dbbe-a0d9-1973-d6e6bee4db3a@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:24:06 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] iov_iter: Improve page extraction (ref, pin or
just list)
On 23.01.23 18:25, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 23-01-23 16:42:56, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 04:38:47PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
>>> Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>>> Also you only mention DIO read - but what about "start DIO write; fork(); touch
>>> buffer" in the parent - now the write buffer belongs to the child and they can
>>> affect the parent's write.
>>
>> I'm struggling to see the problem here. If the child hasn't exec'd, the
>> parent and child are still in the same security domain. The parent
>> could have modified the buffer before calling fork().
>
> Sadly they are not. Android in particular starts applications by forking
> one big binary (zygote) that has multiple apps linked together and relies
> on the fact the child cannot influence the parent after the fork. We've
> already had CVEs with GUP & COW & fork due to this. David Hildebrand has a
> lot of memories regarding this I believe ;)
:)
Once FOLL_PIN is used most of the issues go away and we don't have to
play any games with VM flags or similar ...
With FOLL_PIN, I consider anon a solved problem and not worth any new
fancy ideas.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists