linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvms390 tree with the s390 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0fae8ad5-8dcd-3864-a532-4760f3f2a95c@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:19:23 +0100
From:   Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvms390 tree with the s390 tree

hAm 23.01.23 um 20:02 schrieb Anthony Krowiak:
> 
> On 1/22/23 8:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the kvms390 tree got a conflict in:
>>
>>    drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>>    0daf9878a799 ("s390/vfio_ap: check TAPQ response code when waiting for queue reset")
>>
>> from the s390 tree and commit:
>>
>>    bedac519eefa ("s390/vfio-ap: check TAPQ response code when waiting for queue reset")
>>
>> from the kvms390 tree.
>>
>> They seem to do the same thing, so I used the version of this file from
>> the s390 tree as it's commit is much newer and has other changes to this
>> file i.e. I effectively dropped the kvms390 tree commit.
> 
> 
> That's odd, the patch series posted to the kernel mailing lists did not have both of those patches. I think the problem may have occurred because there was an earlier version of the patch in question that was used to debug a problem in our CI. That patch should have been reverted prior to installing the latest version.


Yes, that patch was part of the kvms390 tree and it was old. I removed it. Sorry for the left-over
The one in the s390 tree is the correct one:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230118203111.529766-3-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com/
is now
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=0daf9878a7990058e74025493820bce0f67654c4

this should be ok now?

Christian