linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 00/10] iov_iter: Improve page extraction (pin or just list)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2023 14:22:36 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/10] iov_iter: Improve page extraction (pin or just
 list)

On 24.01.23 14:16, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 01:44:21PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Once landed upstream, if we feel confident enough (I tend to), we could
>> adjust the open() man page to state that O_DIRECT can now be run
>> concurrently with fork(). Especially, the following documentation might be
>> adjusted:
> 
> Note that while these series coverts the two most commonly used
> O_DIRECT implementations, there are various others ones that do not
> pin the pages yet.

Thanks for the info ... I assume these are then for other filesystems, 
right? (such that we could adjust the tests to exercise these as well)

... do we have a list (or is it easy to make one)? :)

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb