linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PM: runtime: Simplify __rpm_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVRnAVtff2ZrYzf4VGfhTPrUXmn+8o5NyXopLQFm4HuMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:37:38 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: runtime: Simplify __rpm_get_callback()

Hi Rafael,

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:18 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:20 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bjorn,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 7:23 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > Simplify __rpm_get_callback() slightly by returning as soon as the return
> > > value is known.  No functional change intended.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> >
> > Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 650bdddb6b311705 ("PM:
> > runtime: Simplify __rpm_get_callback()") in pm/linux-next.
> >
> > > --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > > @@ -20,8 +20,7 @@ typedef int (*pm_callback_t)(struct device *);
> > >
> > >  static pm_callback_t __rpm_get_callback(struct device *dev, size_t cb_offset)
> > >  {
> > > -       pm_callback_t cb;
> > > -       const struct dev_pm_ops *ops;
> > > +       const struct dev_pm_ops *ops = NULL;
> > >
> > >         if (dev->pm_domain)
> > >                 ops = &dev->pm_domain->ops;
> > > @@ -31,18 +30,14 @@ static pm_callback_t __rpm_get_callback(struct device *dev, size_t cb_offset)
> > >                 ops = dev->class->pm;
> > >         else if (dev->bus && dev->bus->pm)
> > >                 ops = dev->bus->pm;
> > > -       else
> > > -               ops = NULL;
> > >
> > >         if (ops)
> > > -               cb = *(pm_callback_t *)((void *)ops + cb_offset);
> > > -       else
> > > -               cb = NULL;
> > > +               return *(pm_callback_t *)((void *)ops + cb_offset);
> >
> > This is a change in behavior in case the callback turns out to be NULL:
> >   - before, it would fall back to the driver-specific callback below,
> >   - after, it always returns NULL.
>
> Good point and sorry for missing this!
>
> > >
> > > -       if (!cb && dev->driver && dev->driver->pm)
> > > -               cb = *(pm_callback_t *)((void *)dev->driver->pm + cb_offset);
> > > +       if (dev->driver && dev->driver->pm)
> > > +               return *(pm_callback_t *)((void *)dev->driver->pm + cb_offset);
> > >
> > > -       return cb;
> > > +       return NULL;
> > >  }
> >
>
> Something like the patch below (modulo gmail-induced whitespace
> breakage) should restore the previous behavior if I'm not mistaken:
>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/runtime.c |    9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> @@ -31,8 +31,13 @@ static pm_callback_t __rpm_get_callback(
>      else if (dev->bus && dev->bus->pm)
>          ops = dev->bus->pm;
>
> -    if (ops)
> -        return *(pm_callback_t *)((void *)ops + cb_offset);
> +    if (ops) {
> +        pm_callback_t cb;
> +
> +        cb = *(pm_callback_t *)((void *)ops + cb_offset);
> +        if (cb)
> +            return cb;
> +    }
>
>      if (dev->driver && dev->driver->pm)
>          return *(pm_callback_t *)((void *)dev->driver->pm + cb_offset);

Which is now more complex than the original?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds