linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] cacheinfo/arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y8/xJZOourqBvxVR@wendy>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2023 14:54:29 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
CC:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Yong-Xuan Wang <yongxuan.wang@...ive.com>,
        ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] cacheinfo/arch_topology: Updates for v6.3

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 02:42:45PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 02:44:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep,
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 1:22 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
> > > It has been tested on RISC-V which is the main users outside of arm64.
> > 
> > Has it?
> >
> 
> Hmm, I might have mixed up things then. I was on a vacation for quite some
> time and might have assumed Conor response on the thread with testing.
> Extremely sorry for that. However it was in -next for few days before
> Greg applied to his tree.

Sorry chief! The CI stuff we run on the RISC-V patchwork only provides
build coverage etc & my CI against linux-next doesn't check for this kind
of thing.
I'll put it on my todo-list to add that, both for patchwork and in our
internal CI.
I only reviewed the patch that was moving the code to common group and
not the others unfortunately. Next time I'll be sure to review the lot!

Thanks,
Conor.



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)