[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9Cj4ta/DpiVGFeo@biznet-home.integral.gnuweeb.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 10:37:06 +0700
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Xin Li <xin3.li@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
x86 Mailing List <x86@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kselftest Mailing List
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] selftests/x86: sysret_rip: Handle syscall in
a FRED system
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:22:39AM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> + /*
> + * Test that we don't get a mix of REGS_SAVED and REGS_SYSRET.
> + * It needs at least calling do_syscall() twice to assert.
> + */
> + if (regs_ok_state == REGS_UNDEFINED) {
> + /*
> + * First time calling do_syscall().
> + */
> + regs_ok_state = ret;
> + return ret;
> + } else {
Oops, this should not be returning ret here. Ignore this version.
I'll send v5.
--
Ammar Faizi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists