linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,sm8450-camcc: constrain required-opps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dfaa9ea3598e9a59d262b4afa7a52999.sboyd@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:32:06 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,sm8450-camcc: constrain required-opps

Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2023-01-21 10:59:21)
> On 20/01/2023 23:15, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2023-01-19 05:00:27)
> >> Be specific how many required-opps are allowed.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> This change is independent, although logically is connected with my
> >> dtschema pull:
> >> https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/95
> > 
> > Do you want to take it through dt tree?
> 
> I think it would be better if you take it.
> 

Ok, applied to clk-next.