linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/10] clk: qcom: Add STROMER PLUS PLL type for IPQ5332

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e9277836f6797a1b2aaca2300190da9a.sboyd@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:35:13 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>,
        agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
        bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com,
        mturquette@...libre.com, nfraprado@...labora.com,
        quic_gurus@...cinc.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, robimarko@...il.com,
        shawnguo@...nel.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org, will@...nel.org
Cc:     Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] clk: qcom: Add STROMER PLUS PLL type for IPQ5332

Quoting Kathiravan Thirumoorthy (2023-01-25 02:45:13)
> From: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
> 
> Add the support for stromer plus pll, which is found on the IPQ5332
> SoCs. Programming sequence is same as the stromer pll, so we can re-use
> the same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>

I'm amazed that we need so many different register layouts for PLLs. Was
it really never standardized? So sad.