linux-kernel - [PATCH v10 4/8] block: Fix bio_flagged() so that gcc can better optimise it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230125210657.2335748-5-dhowells@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:06:53 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 4/8] block: Fix bio_flagged() so that gcc can better optimise it

Fix bio_flagged() so that multiple instances of it, such as:

	if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_PAGE_REFFED) ||
	    bio_flagged(bio, BIO_PAGE_PINNED))

can be combined by the gcc optimiser into a single test in assembly
(arguably, this is a compiler optimisation issue[1]).

The missed optimisation stems from bio_flagged() comparing the result of
the bitwise-AND to zero.  This results in an out-of-line bio_release_page()
being compiled to something like:

   <+0>:     mov    0x14(%rdi),%eax
   <+3>:     test   $0x1,%al
   <+5>:     jne    0xffffffff816dac53 <bio_release_pages+11>
   <+7>:     test   $0x2,%al
   <+9>:     je     0xffffffff816dac5c <bio_release_pages+20>
   <+11>:    movzbl %sil,%esi
   <+15>:    jmp    0xffffffff816daba1 <__bio_release_pages>
   <+20>:    jmp    0xffffffff81d0b800 <__x86_return_thunk>

However, the test is superfluous as the return type is bool.  Removing it
results in:

   <+0>:     testb  $0x3,0x14(%rdi)
   <+4>:     je     0xffffffff816e4af4 <bio_release_pages+15>
   <+6>:     movzbl %sil,%esi
   <+10>:    jmp    0xffffffff816dab7c <__bio_release_pages>
   <+15>:    jmp    0xffffffff81d0b7c0 <__x86_return_thunk>

instead.

Also, the MOVZBL instruction looks unnecessary[2] - I think it's just
're-booling' the mark_dirty parameter.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108370 [1]
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108371 [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/167391056756.2311931.356007731815807265.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v6
---
 include/linux/bio.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
index c1da63f6c808..10366b8bdb13 100644
--- a/include/linux/bio.h
+++ b/include/linux/bio.h
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static inline void bio_cnt_set(struct bio *bio, unsigned int count)
 
 static inline bool bio_flagged(struct bio *bio, unsigned int bit)
 {
-	return (bio->bi_flags & (1U << bit)) != 0;
+	return bio->bi_flags & (1U << bit);
 }
 
 static inline void bio_set_flag(struct bio *bio, unsigned int bit)