Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2023 22:54:49 +0000
From:   Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
To:     brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com, dlatypov@...gle.com
Cc:     skhan@...uxfoundation.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] lib/hashtable_test.c: add test for the hashtable structure

Add a KUnit test for the kernel hashtable implementation in
include/linux/hashtable.h.

Note that this version does not yet test each of the rcu
alternative versions of functions.

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
---

Changes since v2:
- Remove extraneous hash_init() calls when using DEFINE_HASHTABLE.
- Change up the size of the hashtables in different tests.
- Change formatting to group lines regarding the same hashtable_test_entry.
- Use KUNIT_ASSERT_LEQ() and KUNIT_ASSERT_GEQ() instead of a few if
  statements.

Changes since v1:
- Change Kconfig.debug message to be more succinct.
- Directly increment current element's visited field rather than looking up
  corresponding element.
- Use KUNIT_ASSERT_... statements to check the keys are within range rather
  than using if statements.
- Change hash_for_each_possible test to check buckets using a hash_for_each
  method instead of calculating the bucket number using hash_min.

Note: The check patch script is outputting open brace errors on lines
152, 185, 239 of lib/hashtable_test.c. However, I think these errors are
a mistake as the format of the braces on those lines is consistent
with the Linux Kernel style guide. As David Gow commented on the
last version, "This is a known issue with checkpatch and function
names with "for_each" in them. It was discussed here, and we
ultimately decided just to ignore the warnings:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CABVgOSmCHbGjZBjeWSbPEZbJw22SaBQnoO77xxNzN_ugAwzNiQ@mail.gmail.com/."

 lib/Kconfig.debug    |  13 ++
 lib/Makefile         |   1 +
 lib/hashtable_test.c | 317 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 331 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 lib/hashtable_test.c

diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 881c3f84e88a..69b1452a3eeb 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -2496,6 +2496,19 @@ config LIST_KUNIT_TEST
 
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
+config HASHTABLE_KUNIT_TEST
+	tristate "KUnit Test for Kernel Hashtable structures" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	depends on KUNIT
+	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	help
+	  This builds the hashtable KUnit test suite.
+	  It tests the basic functionality of the API defined in
+	  include/linux/hashtable.h. For more information on KUnit and
+	  unit tests in general please refer to the KUnit documentation
+	  in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 config LINEAR_RANGES_TEST
 	tristate "KUnit test for linear_ranges"
 	depends on KUNIT
diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
index 4d9461bfea42..5f8efbe8e97f 100644
--- a/lib/Makefile
+++ b/lib/Makefile
@@ -369,6 +369,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PLDMFW) += pldmfw/
 CFLAGS_bitfield_kunit.o := $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN)
 obj-$(CONFIG_BITFIELD_KUNIT) += bitfield_kunit.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list-test.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HASHTABLE_KUNIT_TEST) += hashtable_test.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_LINEAR_RANGES_TEST) += test_linear_ranges.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_BITS_TEST) += test_bits.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_CMDLINE_KUNIT_TEST) += cmdline_kunit.o
diff --git a/lib/hashtable_test.c b/lib/hashtable_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1d1b3288dee2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/hashtable_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,317 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit test for the Kernel Hashtable structures.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2022, Google LLC.
+ * Author: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
+ */
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+#include <linux/hashtable.h>
+
+struct hashtable_test_entry {
+	int key;
+	int data;
+	struct hlist_node node;
+	int visited;
+};
+
+static void hashtable_test_hash_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	/* Test the different ways of initialising a hashtable. */
+	DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash1, 2);
+	DECLARE_HASHTABLE(hash2, 3);
+
+	/* When using DECLARE_HASHTABLE, must use hash_init to
+	 * initialize the hashtable.
+	 */
+	hash_init(hash2);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash1));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash2));
+}
+
+static void hashtable_test_hash_empty(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct hashtable_test_entry a;
+	DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 1);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash));
+
+	a.key = 1;
+	a.data = 13;
+	hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key);
+
+	/* Hashtable should no longer be empty. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, hash_empty(hash));
+}
+
+static void hashtable_test_hash_hashed(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct hashtable_test_entry a, b;
+	DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 4);
+
+	a.key = 1;
+	a.data = 13;
+	hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key);
+	b.key = 1;
+	b.data = 2;
+	hash_add(hash, &b.node, b.key);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_hashed(&a.node));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_hashed(&b.node));
+}
+
+static void hashtable_test_hash_add(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct hashtable_test_entry a, b, *x;
+	int bkt;
+	DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3);
+
+	a.key = 1;
+	a.data = 13;
+	a.visited = 0;
+	hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key);
+	b.key = 2;
+	b.data = 10;
+	b.visited = 0;
+	hash_add(hash, &b.node, b.key);
+
+	hash_for_each(hash, bkt, x, node) {
+		x->visited++;
+		if (x->key == a.key)
+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, x->data, 13);
+		else if (x->key == b.key)
+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, x->data, 10);
+		else
+			KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Unexpected key in hashtable.");
+	}
+
+	/* Both entries should have been visited exactly once. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, a.visited, 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, b.visited, 1);
+}
+
+static void hashtable_test_hash_del(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct hashtable_test_entry a, b, *x;
+	DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 6);
+
+	a.key = 1;
+	a.data = 13;
+	hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key);
+	b.key = 2;
+	b.data = 10;
+	b.visited = 0;
+	hash_add(hash, &b.node, b.key);
+
+	hash_del(&b.node);
+	hash_for_each_possible(hash, x, node, b.key) {
+		x->visited++;
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, x->key, b.key);
+	}
+
+	/* The deleted entry should not have been visited. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, b.visited, 0);
+
+	hash_del(&a.node);
+
+	/* The hashtable should be empty. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash));
+}
+
+static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct hashtable_test_entry entries[3];
+	struct hashtable_test_entry *x;
+	int bkt, i, j, count;
+	DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3);
+
+	/* Add three entries to the hashtable. */
+	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+		entries[i].key = i;
+		entries[i].data = i + 10;
+		entries[i].visited = 0;
+		hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key);
+	}
+
+	count = 0;
+	hash_for_each(hash, bkt, x, node) {
+		x->visited += 1;
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, x->key, 0, "Unexpected key in hashtable.");
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, x->key, 3, "Unexpected key in hashtable.");
+		count++;
+	}
+
+	/* Should have visited each entry exactly once. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3);
+	for (j = 0; j < 3; j++)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1);
+}
+
+static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each_safe(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct hashtable_test_entry entries[3];
+	struct hashtable_test_entry *x;
+	struct hlist_node *tmp;
+	int bkt, i, j, count;
+	DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3);
+
+	/* Add three entries to the hashtable. */
+	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+		entries[i].key = i;
+		entries[i].data = i + 10;
+		entries[i].visited = 0;
+		hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key);
+	}
+
+	count = 0;
+	hash_for_each_safe(hash, bkt, tmp, x, node) {
+		x->visited += 1;
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, x->key, 0, "Unexpected key in hashtable.");
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, x->key, 3, "Unexpected key in hashtable.");
+		count++;
+
+		/* Delete entry during loop. */
+		hash_del(&x->node);
+	}
+
+	/* Should have visited each entry exactly once. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3);
+	for (j = 0; j < 3; j++)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1);
+}
+
+static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct hashtable_test_entry entries[4];
+	struct hashtable_test_entry *x, *y;
+	int buckets[2];
+	int bkt, i, j, count;
+	DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 5);
+
+	/* Add three entries with key = 0 to the hashtable. */
+	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+		entries[i].key = 0;
+		entries[i].data = i;
+		entries[i].visited = 0;
+		hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key);
+	}
+
+	/* Add an entry with key = 1. */
+	entries[3].key = 1;
+	entries[3].data = 3;
+	entries[3].visited = 0;
+	hash_add(hash, &entries[3].node, entries[3].key);
+
+	count = 0;
+	hash_for_each_possible(hash, x, node, 0) {
+		x->visited += 1;
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, x->data, 0, "Unexpected data in hashtable.");
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, x->data, 4, "Unexpected data in hashtable.");
+		count++;
+	}
+
+	/* Should have visited each entry with key = 0 exactly once. */
+	for (j = 0; j < 3; j++)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1);
+
+	/* Save the buckets for the different keys. */
+	hash_for_each(hash, bkt, y, node) {
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, y->key, 0, "Unexpected key in hashtable.");
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG(test, y->key, 1, "Unexpected key in hashtable.");
+		buckets[y->key] = bkt;
+	}
+
+	/* If entry with key = 1 is in the same bucket as the entries with
+	 * key = 0, check it was visited. Otherwise ensure that only three
+	 * entries were visited.
+	 */
+	if (buckets[0] == buckets[1]) {
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 4);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[3].visited, 1);
+	} else {
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[3].visited, 0);
+	}
+}
+
+static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible_safe(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct hashtable_test_entry entries[4];
+	struct hashtable_test_entry *x, *y;
+	struct hlist_node *tmp;
+	int buckets[2];
+	int bkt, i, j, count;
+	DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 5);
+
+	/* Add three entries with key = 0 to the hashtable. */
+	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+		entries[i].key = 0;
+		entries[i].data = i;
+		entries[i].visited = 0;
+		hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key);
+	}
+
+	/* Add an entry with key = 1. */
+	entries[3].key = 1;
+	entries[3].data = 3;
+	entries[3].visited = 0;
+	hash_add(hash, &entries[3].node, entries[3].key);
+
+	count = 0;
+	hash_for_each_possible_safe(hash, x, tmp, node, 0) {
+		x->visited += 1;
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, x->data, 0, "Unexpected data in hashtable.");
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, x->data, 4, "Unexpected data in hashtable.");
+		count++;
+
+		/* Delete entry during loop. */
+		hash_del(&x->node);
+	}
+
+	/* Should have visited each entry with key = 0 exactly once. */
+	for (j = 0; j < 3; j++)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1);
+
+	/* Save the buckets for the different keys. */
+	hash_for_each(hash, bkt, y, node) {
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, y->key, 0, "Unexpected key in hashtable.");
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG(test, y->key, 1, "Unexpected key in hashtable.");
+		buckets[y->key] = bkt;
+	}
+
+	/* If entry with key = 1 is in the same bucket as the entries with
+	 * key = 0, check it was visited. Otherwise ensure that only three
+	 * entries were visited.
+	 */
+	if (buckets[0] == buckets[1]) {
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 4);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[3].visited, 1);
+	} else {
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[3].visited, 0);
+	}
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case hashtable_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_init),
+	KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_empty),
+	KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_hashed),
+	KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_add),
+	KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_del),
+	KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each),
+	KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each_safe),
+	KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible),
+	KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible_safe),
+	{},
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite hashtable_test_module = {
+	.name = "hashtable",
+	.test_cases = hashtable_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(&hashtable_test_module);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

base-commit: 5835ffc27381c2d32c3f0d7b575cb3397555ab47
-- 
2.39.1.456.gfc5497dd1b-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists