lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtAvyFUsGEgAkeTF+=B1+MySYd605Vv94BT6=1M96bwDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2023 05:57:55 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/117] 5.15.90-rc2 review

On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 15:22, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 15:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.90 release.
> > There are 117 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:48:53 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.90-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions found on arm64 for both 5.15.90-rc2 and 5.10.165-rc2.
>
> * qemu-arm64-mte, kselftest-arm64
>   - arm64_check_buffer_fill
>   - arm64_check_child_memory
>   - arm64_check_ksm_options
>   - arm64_check_mmap_options
>   - arm64_check_tags_inclusion
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> We are in a process to bisecting this problem and there are updates coming
> from kselftest rootfs.

The above said regressions are due to the Qemu version upgrade to 7.2.

With reference to my previous emails,
This is not a kernel regression on stable-rc 6.1, 5.15, and 5.10.

- Naresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ