[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yt9dh6wec21a.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:00:01 +0100
From: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/49] ipc/shm: Use the vma iterator for munmap calls
Hi Liam,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com> writes:
> From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
>
> Pass through the vma iterator to do_vmi_munmap() to handle the iterator
> state internally
>
> Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> ---
> ipc/shm.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
git bisect says this breaks the shm* testcase in ltp on (at least) s390:
# ./test.sh
tst_test.c:1558: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s
shmat01.c:124: TPASS: shmat() succeeded to attach NULL address
shmat01.c:92: TFAIL: shmat() failed: EINVAL (22)
shmat01.c:92: TFAIL: shmat() failed: EINVAL (22)
shmat01.c:92: TFAIL: shmat() failed: EINVAL (22)
Summary:
passed 1
failed 3
broken 0
skipped 0
warnings 0
#
Can you take a look? Thanks!
reverting the above commit fixes the issue.
Thanks,
Sven
Powered by blists - more mailing lists