[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9EtohjVnoJLqccx@alley>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:24:50 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/module_64: Improve restore_r2() return
semantics
On Tue 2023-01-24 19:38:04, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> restore_r2() returns 1 on success, which is surprising for a non-boolean
> function. Change it to return 0 on success and -errno on error to match
> kernel coding convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
It is in the right direction. Just note that there are more functions
with the boolean semantic passed via int return value. But there
are also other functions already using the 0/-E* return values so
this is rather positive change.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists