lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59982fd2-fe5b-bd7d-40fd-0fba7de6687c@9elements.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2023 20:18:28 +0530
From:   Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] hwmon: (pmbus/core) Generalise pmbus get status

Hi

On 24-01-2023 11:18 pm, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 07:40:19AM +0100, Naresh Solanki wrote:
>> Add function pmbus get status that can be used to get both pmbus
>> specific status & regulator status
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@...ements.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++--------------
>>   1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
>> index 1b70cf3be313..12b662b91306 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
>> @@ -2735,64 +2735,16 @@ static const struct pmbus_status_category __maybe_unused pmbus_status_flag_map[]
>>   	},
>>   };
>>   
>> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REGULATOR)
>> -static int pmbus_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> -{
>> -	struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
>> -	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
>> -	struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> -	u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
>> -	int ret;
>>   
>> -	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> -	ret = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION);
>> -	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> -
>> -	if (ret < 0)
>> -		return ret;
>> -
>> -	return !!(ret & PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int _pmbus_regulator_on_off(struct regulator_dev *rdev, bool enable)
>> +static int pmbus_get_flags(struct pmbus_data *data, u8 page, unsigned int *error)
> 
> Moving this code outside the conditional without usage there will result
> in compile errors due to an unused function if compiled with REGULATOR
> disabled. While this will (hopefully) change in one of the later patches,
> it is still unacceptable because it may result in bisect failures.
> 
Yes. With REGULATOR disabled. There is warning:
warning: ‘pmbus_get_flags’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
  2739 | static int pmbus_get_flags(struct pmbus_data *data, u8 page, 
unsigned int *error)

Will add maybe unused as below:
static int __maybe_unused pmbus_get_flags(struct pmbus_data *data, u8 
page, unsigned int *error)

Let me know your view.

>>   {
>> -	struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
>> -	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
>> -	struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> -	u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
>> -	int ret;
>> -
>> -	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> -	ret = pmbus_update_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION,
>> -				     PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON,
>> -				     enable ? PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON : 0);
>> -	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> -
>> -	return ret;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int pmbus_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> -{
>> -	return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 1);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int pmbus_regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> -{
>> -	return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 0);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int *flags)
>> -{
>> -	int i, status;
>>   	const struct pmbus_status_category *cat;
>>   	const struct pmbus_status_assoc *bit;
>> -	struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
>> -	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
>> -	struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> -	u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
>> +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(data->dev);
>>   	int func = data->info->func[page];
>> +	int i, status, ret;
>>   
>> -	*flags = 0;
>> +	*error = 0;
> 
> You are making personal preference changes here. Maybe that is the reason
> why the patch looks that large. Please try to leave existing code alone.
> If there is a reason to change a variable name (or other cosmetic changes,
> like moving variable declarations around), do it in a separate patch which
> only does that, and explain why it is needed and/or makes sense.
Sure. Will do.

Best Regards,
Naresh
> 
> Thanks,
> Guenter
> 
>>   
>>   	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>>   
>> @@ -2803,14 +2755,15 @@ static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned
>>   
>>   		status = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, cat->reg);
>>   		if (status < 0) {
>> -			mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> -			return status;
>> +			ret = status;
>> +			goto unlock;
>>   		}
>>   
>>   		for (bit = cat->bits; bit->pflag; bit++) {
>>   			if (status & bit->pflag)
>> -				*flags |= bit->rflag;
>> +				*error |= bit->rflag;
>>   		}
>> +
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	/*
>> @@ -2823,36 +2776,99 @@ static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned
>>   	 * REGULATOR_ERROR_<foo>_WARN.
>>   	 */
>>   	status = pmbus_get_status(client, page, PMBUS_STATUS_WORD);
>> -	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> -	if (status < 0)
>> -		return status;
>>   
>> -	if (pmbus_regulator_is_enabled(rdev)) {
>> +	if (status < 0) {
>> +		ret = status;
>> +		goto unlock;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION);
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		goto unlock;
>> +
>> +	if (ret & PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON) {
>>   		if (status & PB_STATUS_OFF)
>> -			*flags |= REGULATOR_ERROR_FAIL;
>> +			*error |= REGULATOR_ERROR_FAIL;
>>   
>>   		if (status & PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N)
>> -			*flags |= REGULATOR_ERROR_REGULATION_OUT;
>> +			*error |= REGULATOR_ERROR_REGULATION_OUT;
>>   	}
>>   	/*
>>   	 * Unlike most other status bits, PB_STATUS_{IOUT_OC,VOUT_OV} are
>>   	 * defined strictly as fault indicators (not warnings).
>>   	 */
>>   	if (status & PB_STATUS_IOUT_OC)
>> -		*flags |= REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_CURRENT;
>> +		*error |= REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_CURRENT;
>>   	if (status & PB_STATUS_VOUT_OV)
>> -		*flags |= REGULATOR_ERROR_REGULATION_OUT;
>> +		*error |= REGULATOR_ERROR_REGULATION_OUT;
>>   
>>   	/*
>>   	 * If we haven't discovered any thermal faults or warnings via
>>   	 * PMBUS_STATUS_TEMPERATURE, map PB_STATUS_TEMPERATURE to a warning as
>>   	 * a (conservative) best-effort interpretation.
>>   	 */
>> -	if (!(*flags & (REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP | REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP_WARN)) &&
>> +	if (!(*error & (REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP | REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP_WARN)) &&
>>   	    (status & PB_STATUS_TEMPERATURE))
>> -		*flags |= REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP_WARN;
>> +		*error |= REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP_WARN;
>>   
>> -	return 0;
>> +unlock:
>> +	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REGULATOR)
>> +static int pmbus_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
>> +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
>> +	struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> +	u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> +	ret = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION);
>> +	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	return !!(ret & PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int _pmbus_regulator_on_off(struct regulator_dev *rdev, bool enable)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
>> +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
>> +	struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> +	u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> +	ret = pmbus_update_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION,
>> +				     PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON,
>> +				     enable ? PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON : 0);
>> +	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int pmbus_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> +{
>> +	return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int pmbus_regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> +{
>> +	return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int pmbus_regulator_get_error_flags(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int *flags)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
>> +	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
>> +	struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> +
>> +	return pmbus_get_flags(data, rdev_get_id(rdev), flags);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int pmbus_regulator_get_status(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> -- 
>> 2.38.1
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ