[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWZ+_kdMp+0VfYAJZRHBWiyobQQJwEM_kHN6yeVVGxSvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:28:04 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] arch_topology: Build cacheinfo from primary CPU
Hi Sudeep,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 3:54 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 02:55:41PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Geert, can you please try with the patch Conor pointed out and see if
> > that helps to fix the allocation failures[1]
> >
>
> Sorry for the nag, but did you get the chance to test -next with [1]
> and see if it fixes the cacheinfo memory failure you were observing ?
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230103035316.3841303-1-leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com/
After applying that patch, the issue is gone.
Thanks, sending my Tb!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists