lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2023 03:08:47 +0900
From:   Jongwoo Han <jongwooo.han@...il.com>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jongwooo.han@...il.com
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: fix typo in comments

Signed-off-by: Jongwoo Han <jongwooo.han@...il.com>
---
 mm/gup.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index f45a3a5be..01298e887 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static int check_vma_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long gup_flags)
  * This does not guarantee that the page exists in the user mappings when
  * __get_user_pages returns, and there may even be a completely different
  * page there in some cases (eg. if mmapped pagecache has been invalidated
- * and subsequently re faulted). However it does guarantee that the page
+ * and subsequently re-faulted). However it does guarantee that the page
  * won't be freed completely. And mostly callers simply care that the page
  * contains data that was valid *at some point in time*. Typically, an IO
  * or similar operation cannot guarantee anything stronger anyway because
-- 
2.37.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ