[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0be2faed-6b95-0c15-1016-3b4d1a980998@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:31:34 -0600
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <Borislav.Petkov@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Venu Busireddy <venu.busireddy@...cle.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Michael Sterritt <sterritt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/4] virt/coco/sev-guest: Add throttling awareness
On 1/25/23 11:48, Dionna Amalie Glaze wrote:
>>
>> So these should really be:
>>
>> #define SNP_GUEST_REQ_INVALID_LEN (1ULL << 32)
>> #define SNP_GUEST_REQ_ERR_BUSY (2ULL << 32)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom
>>
>
> Patch 3/4 cleans them up with just such a shift. They also move from
> arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h to include/uapi/linux/sev-guest.h.
> Is it okay to delay that cleanup until after the fix patch?
Yeah, if they're being deleted later and fixed up, I'm ok with that.
Thanks,
Tom
>
>
> --
> -Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists