[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63d17ed343624_3a36e5294ac@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:11:15 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
<nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] nvdimm: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()
Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool().
> However, the latter is more used within the kernel.
>
> In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to
> the other function name.
>
> While at it, include the corresponding header file (<linux/kstrtox.h>)
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> This patch was already sent as a part of a serie ([1]) that axed all usages
> of strtobool().
> Most of the patches have been merged in -next.
>
> I synch'ed with latest -next and re-send the remaining ones as individual
> patches.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - synch with latest -next.
Looks good, applied for v6.3.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists